Services: Chart Review

Clinician-led. Auditor-controlled. Built for accuracy and defensibility.

Fast, clear, low-abrasion recoveries powered by certified clinicians and coders who review each case with transparency, clinical credibility and disciplined attention.

Review Pathways

Review pathways built for maximum yield.

Penstock’s chart review programs validate coding accuracy, documentation sufficiency, and policy alignment across inpatient, outpatient, and professional claims.

Full-Scope Review

Validates coding accuracy, documentation sufficiency, and clinical support across inpatient, outpatient, and professional claims.

Second-Look Review

Re-examines charts previously reviewed with a “no-finding” result to uncover missed overpayments.

Why Penstock

The Penstock Difference.

Chart review isn’t just documentation validation—it’s understanding the clinical, coding, and policy logic behind every payment.

Penstock delivers:

  • A flexible, collaborative partnership
  • Defensible recoveries
  • Auditor-controlled rigor
  • Sustainable cost avoidance
  • Low provider abrasion
  • Consistent execution
Ready for clearer, faster, more defensible chart reviews? Let’s take a closer look, together. 

How We’re Different

What changes when review is done right.

When chart review is executed with discipline and plan-specific context, its value extends well beyond individual recoveries. The work becomes adaptable, defensible, and usable across the full payment lifecycle—supporting accuracy wherever and however review is applied.

Built to support any review position:

  • Pre- and post-pay review
  • All lines of business
  • Any audit pass position
  • Second-look reviews of prior audits with no findings

Two ways to win

Full-scope reviews and second-look programs both deliver sophisticated, clinically sound findings.

Accuracy that sticks

Low appeal and overturn rates thanks to transparent rationale and provider-ready documentation and support.

Speed without ambiguity

Clear criteria, fast turnarounds and clean documentation.

Friction-light

Minimal abrasion. Maximum clarity. Findings backed by evidence, logic, and policy.

Our Results

Measured results.
Meaningful impact.

These outcomes reflect accuracy, durability, and meaningful financial impact for health plans.

6.5%

appeal rate

61%

claims we review results in a finding

98%

net-appeal upheld rate

43%

findings on second-look chart reviews

(previously ‘no-finding’ charts)

Where Issues Hide

Chart Review Examples.

Penstock’s auditors review the full spectrum of inpatient, outpatient and professional claims. Here are some of the high-value issues we routinely uncover.

Clinical Expertise

Short intro

  • DRG coding and clinical validation
  • Short-stay validation
  • Readmission review
  • Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) review
Outpatient

Short intro

  • Emergency department level accuracy
  • Observation hour validation
  • Trauma activation review
  • APC and bundling mismatches
  • Canceled or incomplete procedures
  • Implant and device validation
  • High-cost drug validation (J-codes, dosage, wastage, administration codes)
Professional

Short intro

  • Modifier accuracy and facility mismatch
  • Unit and service-level validation
  • Bundling and unbundling accuracy

Has your PI strategy stalled? Big promises, flat results?

It might be time for a fresh look.

Contact Us